The United States residential solar market is currently navigating its most profound structural transformation since the inception of the industry. For nearly two decades, the economic viability of rooftop solar was predicated on a simple regulatory mechanism: Net Energy Metering (NEM). This policy, which allowed homeowners to spin their electric meters backward and exchange surplus energy for grid power at a one-to-one retail rate, effectively subsidized the early adoption of distributed energy resources (DERs). However, as solar penetration has reached critical mass in key markets like California, Hawaii, and Arizona, the regulatory framework has shifted dramatically from volume-based compensation (NEM 1.0/2.0) to value-based billing structures (NEM 3.0/Net Billing Tariffs).
This report provides a comprehensive, expert-level analysis of this transition. It dissects the nuanced mechanics of the three primary NEM regimes, exploring the shift from the "grid-as-battery" philosophy of NEM 1.0 to the algorithmic, avoided-cost pricing models of NEM 3.0. The analysis demonstrates that while NEM 3.0 significantly degrades the economics of solar-only installations—reducing export value by approximately 75% in California 1—it simultaneously creates a powerful economic imperative for residential energy storage. Under the new Net Billing Tariff, the solar battery is no longer merely a resilience asset for power outages; it is a fundamental financial instrument required to arbitrate energy prices against the utility's time-of-use (TOU) rates.
Furthermore, this document extends its scope beyond the California market to examine how these policy trends are rippling across the United States. From North Carolina’s "Bridge Rate" and Arizona's "Resource Comparison Proxy" to the deregulated buyback plans of Texas and the mature "Smart DER" markets of Hawaii, a national pattern is emerging: the decoupling of import rates from export rates and the prioritization of self-consumption over grid export. By synthesizing data on payback periods, grandfathering provisions, transferability rules, and emerging technologies, this report serves as a definitive roadmap for homeowners, industry stakeholders, and policymakers navigating the complex modern landscape of distributed energy.
---
Chapter 1: The Genesis of Net Metering and the Utility "Death Spiral"
To understand the complexity of NEM 3.0, one must first deconstruct the foundational principles of the policies that preceded it. Net Energy Metering was not merely a billing mechanism; it was a policy tool designed to simplify the interaction between small-scale independent power producers (homeowners) and the monolithic utility grid.
1.1 The Philosophy of Retail Rate Parity (NEM 1.0)
In the nascent stages of the solar industry, policymakers recognized that the administrative burden of treating every residential solar array as a commercial power plant would strangle the market. The solution was NEM 1.0: a system of administrative simplicity.
- The "Grid as Battery" Concept: Under NEM 1.0, the electrical grid functioned as a 100% efficient, free battery for the homeowner.3 If a solar system generated 10 kWh of excess electricity at noon, that energy flowed to the grid, and the homeowner received a credit for 10 kWh. This credit could be redeemed later that night, or even months later in the winter, to offset consumption.
- One-to-One Valuation: The critical economic feature was parity. The value of the energy exported was identical to the value of the energy imported. If the retail rate of electricity was $0.20/kWh, the homeowner was effectively paid $0.20/kWh for their exports.4
1.2 The Economic Friction: Cost Shifts and the Utility Model
As solar adoption scaled, particularly in investor-owned utility (IOU) territories like Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) and Southern California Edison (SCE), the "lost revenue" from NEM customers began to impact utility balance sheets. Utilities argued that NEM 1.0 created a "cost shift."
- The Fixed Cost Argument: Utilities operate largely on fixed costs—maintaining poles, wires, transformers, and substations costs the same regardless of how much electricity flows through them. When a NEM 1.0 customer netted their bill to zero, they effectively ceased contributing to these fixed infrastructure costs, ostensibly shifting the burden to non-solar ratepayers.1
- The "Duck Curve": The proliferation of solar also fundamentally altered the daily load profile of the grid. The "Duck Curve" phenomenon describes the steep drop in net demand during the midday (when solar production is high) followed by a rapid ramp-up in demand in the late afternoon (when the sun sets and residents return home).
This operational and financial tension necessitated a policy evolution, leading first to the transitional NEM 2.0 and ultimately to the paradigm-shifting NEM 3.0.
---
Chapter 2: The Transitional Era — NEM 2.0
Implemented in California around 2016-2017 and mirrored in various forms across states like Florida and North Carolina, NEM 2.0 was a regulatory compromise. It retained the core viability of net metering while introducing mechanisms to ensure solar customers contributed to grid upkeep and aligned their behavior with grid needs.
2.1 Structural Modifications in NEM 2.0
While NEM 2.0 maintained the general principle of netting exports against imports, it introduced three specific mechanisms that eroded the "perfect" economics of NEM 1.0.
2.1.1 Non-Bypassable Charges (NBCs)
The most direct response to the "cost shift" argument was the introduction of Non-Bypassable Charges.1 Under NEM 1.0, a customer could theoretically pay $0.00 to the utility if their generation matched their consumption. Under NEM 2.0, this was no longer possible.
- Consumption-Based Fees: NBCs are levied on every kilowatt-hour (kWh) imported from the grid, regardless of how much energy is subsequently exported. These charges fund public purpose programs, wildfire mitigation, and nuclear decommissioning.
- Economic Impact: Even if a customer exports 1,000 kWh and imports 1,000 kWh, they must pay NBCs (typically ~$0.02-$0.03/kWh) on the 1,000 kWh of imports. This effectively reduces the value of the solar "credit" by roughly 10%, as the export credit cannot offset these specific line-item charges.6
2.1.2 Mandatory Time-of-Use (TOU) Rates
NEM 2.0 forced a behavioral shift by mandating Time-of-Use rates for all solar customers.1
- The Price Signal: Utilities restructured rates to make electricity expensive during the "Peak" window (typically 4:00 PM – 9:00 PM) and cheaper during "Off-Peak" hours (daytime).
- The Solar Disadvantage: Since solar production peaks at midday (Off-Peak) and drops to zero during the evening (Peak), homeowners were effectively selling low-value energy and buying high-value energy. While the volume of energy might net out, the dollar value often left a residual balance. This required solar installers to slightly oversize systems (e.g., to 110% of usage) to ensure the financial savings remained attractive.
2.1.3 Interconnection Application Fees
NEM 2.0 ended the era of free grid access. Applicants were required to pay one-time interconnection fees, ranging from $75 to $145 depending on the utility.8 While a minor capital cost in the context of a total system purchase, it established the precedent that grid access was a privilege, not a right.
2.2 Legacy Protections: Grandfathering and Transferability
Crucially, NEM 2.0 retained the strong consumer protections of its predecessor regarding legacy status.
- 20-Year Lock-In: Systems interconnected under NEM 2.0 are guaranteed their rate structure for 20 years from the date of Permission to Operate (PTO).4
- Transferability: This grandfathered status is fully transferable to subsequent property owners. If a homeowner sells their house in Year 5, the buyer inherits the remaining 15 years of the NEM 2.0 arrangement.10 This transferability has solidified NEM 2.0 homes as premium real estate assets, as they offer a verified stream of utility savings that new installations can no longer match.
---
Chapter 3: The Paradigm Shift — NEM 3.0 (The Net Billing Tariff)
The transition to NEM 3.0, officially termed the Net Billing Tariff (NBT) in California, represents a complete dismantling of the traditional net metering model. Effective for all interconnection applications submitted after April 14, 2023, NEM 3.0 shifts the compensation logic from "retail rate parity" to "avoided cost valuation".1
3.1 The Mechanics of Net Billing
The fundamental change in NEM 3.0 is the decoupling of the import rate from the export rate. Under previous regimes, these rates were linked; under NBT, they are entirely distinct variables.
3.1.1 The Avoided Cost Calculator (ACC)
Instead of crediting exports at the retail rate (what the customer pays), utilities now credit exports at the "Avoided Cost" rate (what the utility saves by not generating that power elsewhere). This is determined by the Avoided Cost Calculator (ACC).2
- Wholesale Valuation: The average export rate under the ACC plummets from ~$0.30/kWh (retail) to ~$0.04 - $0.08/kWh (wholesale).1 This constitutes a ~75% reduction in the value of exported solar energy.
- Hourly Volatility: The ACC is not a flat rate. It varies by hour, day, month, and utility territory, resulting in 576 different possible export rates throughout the year.2
- The "September Spike": The ACC is designed to reflect grid stress. During months like September, when the grid is strained by heatwaves and low hydro availability, export rates in the evening (6:00 PM – 8:00 PM) can skyrocket to over $2.00 or even $3.00 per kWh.2 This massive price signal is intended to incentivize battery discharge during critical grid events.
3.1.2 Instantaneous Netting vs. Hourly Netting
A subtle but devastating technical change in NEM 3.0 is the shift to "instantaneous netting."
- NEM 1.0/2.0 (Hourly Netting): If a system produced 5 kWh and the home used 2 kWh within the same hour, the meter would register 3 kWh of net export. The homeowner could run appliances intermittently within that hour without penalty.
- NEM 3.0 (Instantaneous Netting): Netting occurs at sub-hourly intervals (often 15 minutes or essentially real-time).14 If a cloud passes over for 10 minutes while the dryer is running, the home immediately imports expensive grid power. When the sun returns 10 minutes later, the system exports power at the cheap ACC rate. This lack of "buffer" prevents the passive offsetting of usage that made solar-only systems efficient, severely penalizing systems without batteries.
3.1.3 Mandatory Electrification Rates
NEM 3.0 participants are mandated to enroll in specific "electrification" TOU rate plans (e.g., PG&E E-ELEC, SCE TOU-D-PRIME, SDG&E EV-TOU-5).11
- High Fixed Charges: These plans often carry higher monthly base charges (e.g., ~$15/month).17
- Extreme Differentials: The price gap between off-peak (midnight) and on-peak (evening) is exacerbated. While this lowers the cost of charging an EV at night, it significantly raises the penalty for pulling energy from the grid during the evening peak if the solar/battery system is depleted.
3.2 The "ACC Plus" Adder
Recognizing the shock to the market, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) introduced a temporary "glide path" called the ACC Plus Adder for PG&E and SCE customers.16
- The Adder: This is a fixed cents-per-kWh bonus added to the export rate.
- 2025 Values: For systems interconnected in 2025, the adder is approximately 1.3 cents/kWh for PG&E and 2.4 cents/kWh for SCE.18
- Phase Out: The adder declines by 20% annually and is available only for customers who interconnect before the end of 2027. Once a customer secures an adder, they retain that specific rate for 9 years. (Note: SDG&E customers do not receive this adder).
3.3 Grandfathering and Transferability Under NEM 3.0
The legacy protections under NEM 3.0 are significantly weaker than previous iterations, altering the long-term value proposition for homeowners.
- 9-Year Lock-In: New NEM 3.0 customers are locked into their specific ACC export rate schedule for only 9 years (compared to 20 years for NEM 1/2).4
- Non-Transferable: Critically, this 9-year lock-in is not transferable to a new homebuyer.9 Upon the sale of the property, the new owner loses the seller's vintage status and is reset to the current ACC rules and adders applicable at the time of transfer. This creates a "reset" risk that did not exist under NEM 1.0 or 2.0.
---
Chapter 4: Economic Impact and Financial Modeling
The structural changes of NEM 3.0 have fundamentally reshaped the return on investment (ROI) profile for residential solar. The passive investment model—installing panels to offset a bill—has been replaced by an active arbitrage model requiring energy storage.
4.1 Comparative Payback Analysis
The following table synthesizes data regarding the payback periods and lifetime savings across the three regimes.
| Metric | NEM 2.0 (Historical) | NEM 3.0 (Solar Only) | NEM 3.0 (Solar + Battery) |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Configuration | 7.6 kW PV | 7.6 kW PV | 7.6 kW PV + 13.5 kWh Battery |
| Export Compensation | Retail (~$0.30/kWh) | Wholesale (~$0.05/kWh) | Optimized (~$0.05 - $3.00/kWh) |
| Bill Offset Ability | 90-100% | 40-55% | 70-90% |
| Simple Payback Period | 4.5 - 5.5 Years | 8.0 - 10.0 Years | 6.5 - 8.0 Years |
| 25-Year Lifetime Savings | ~$116,000 | ~$73,000 | ~$95,000+ |
| Monthly Bill Residual | ~$18 (NBCs) | ~$96 (Imports) | ~$25 (Optimized) |
Data synthesized from.1
4.2 The "Solar-Only" Cliff
Under NEM 3.0, a standalone solar system faces a diminishing returns curve. Because exports are valued so poorly (~5 cents) compared to imports (~45 cents), every kWh exported represents a financial loss of 40 cents compared to self-consumption.17
- Oversizing Penalty: Under NEM 2.0, oversizing a system to 110% of usage was standard practice to eliminate the bill. Under NEM 3.0, oversizing a solar-only system is financially detrimental because the excess production yields negligible credits that cannot offset the fixed charges or evening usage.
- Design Shift: Solar-only systems under NEM 3.0 must be significantly undersized, designed to cover only the daytime loads (AC, pool pumps) that occur while the sun is shining. This drastically limits the potential for total bill reduction.
4.3 The Battery Arbitrage Strategy
The economics of NEM 3.0 are salvaged through the integration of batteries. The battery allows the homeowner to engage in "synthetic net metering."
- Self-Consumption: The primary economic driver is avoiding the purchase of expensive grid power in the evening. By storing the cheap solar energy generated at noon and discharging it at 7:00 PM, the homeowner effectively "buys" their own power at the cost of generation rather than the retail rate.3
- Grid Services: In late summer (August/September), the ACC export rates spike dramatically. A battery system programmed to dump its full capacity to the grid during these 2-hour windows can generate hundreds of dollars in credits, effectively subsidizing the rest of the year's electricity costs.11
---
Chapter 5: Technical Implementation — Hardware and Software Logic
Adapting to NEM 3.0 requires not just a financial calculation but a technical reconfiguration of how home energy systems operate. The "set it and forget it" nature of NEM 1.0 has been replaced by active, software-driven energy management.
5.1 Battery Chemistry and Cycling
Under NEM 2.0, batteries were primarily for backup power; they sat idle 99% of the time waiting for a blackout. Under NEM 3.0, batteries must cycle daily to provide ROI.
- Chemistry Implications: This necessitates the use of Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) batteries (like the Enphase IQ Battery 5P or FranklinWH), which generally offer higher cycle life (6,000+ cycles) compared to older Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) chemistries (like the original Tesla Powerwall 2), although newer NMC iterations are improving durability.
- Depth of Discharge: Systems must be configured to utilize 80-90% of their capacity daily, reserving only a small buffer (e.g., 20%) for unexpected outages.
5.2 Optimizing Configuration Settings
To maximize savings, homeowners must configure their battery software (Tesla App, Enphase Enlighten) correctly. The default "Backup Only" mode will result in financial losses under NEM 3.0.11
5.2.1 Tesla Powerwall Settings
- Operational Mode: Must be set to "Time-Based Control". This allows the algorithm to import rates from the utility plan (e.g., PG&E E-ELEC) and dispatch power when rates are highest.
- Energy Exports: Must be set to "Everything" (Solar + Battery). This is critical for capturing the "September Spike." If set to "Solar Only," the battery will not discharge to the grid during the high-value ACC windows.
- Backup Reserve: Recommended to be set as low as possible (e.g., 0-20%) during non-storm seasons to maximize the arbitrage capacity.
5.2.2 Enphase IQ Battery Settings
- Profile: Select "Savings Mode" or "AI Optimization." This prioritizes bill reduction over pure backup.
- Grid Profiles: Installers must select the correct "NEM 3.0 / CA Rule 21" grid profile during commissioning to ensuring the system recognizes the specific export limits and ramp rates required by the utility.20
---
Chapter 6: Policy Variance Across the United States
While "NEM 3.0" is a California-specific term, the transition toward Net Billing and away from retail net metering is a national trend. Several key states serve as case studies for this broader shift.
6.1 Arizona: The Resource Comparison Proxy (RCP)
Arizona is often cited as a precursor to California’s regulatory shifts. The state utilizes a compensation model known as the Resource Comparison Proxy (RCP).21
- Declining Export Rate: The export rate is not based on retail prices but on a proxy value that steps down annually. For the 2024-2025 period, the rate in APS territory is approximately 6.85 cents/kWh.21
- Annual Step-Down: This rate is allowed to decrease by up to 10% per year, creating a "glideslope" similar to California's ACC Plus adder.
- Lock-In: Like California, customers lock in their export rate for 10 years at the time of interconnection. This creates an urgency for homeowners to install sooner rather than later.
6.2 North Carolina: The "Bridge Rate" Compromise
North Carolina has implemented a unique transition mechanism involving a "Bridge Rate".23
- The Bridge: Customers can opt for a transitional rate until 2027. This rate blends aspects of monthly netting with minimum bills, offering a "softer landing" than a direct jump to net billing.
- The Future (Residential Solar Choice): After the Bridge Rate expires, customers are moved to the "Residential Solar Choice" plan. This mandates Time-of-Use rates with critical peak pricing, closely mimicking the complexity of California’s NEM 3.0 structure.
- Commercial Waterfall: For commercial systems, excess energy often follows a "waterfall" logic, where credits are applied first to off-peak, then shoulder, then on-peak periods, degrading in value at each step.25
6.3 Hawaii: The Mature "Smart DER" Market
Hawaii, having the highest solar penetration in the nation, moved past net metering years ago and has now evolved into the "Smart Renewable Energy" (Smart DER) framework.26
- Smart DER vs. Smart Export: The new Smart DER programs replace the previous "Customer Grid Supply Plus" (CGS+) and "Smart Export" tariffs.
- Battery Bonus: Recognizing that export compensation alone is insufficient to drive behavior, Hawaii actively pays customers upfront cash incentives (e.g., $850 per kW) to install batteries and commit them to grid services.26 This explicitly shifts the value proposition from "energy savings" to "grid services."
- Shift and Save: Hawaii is piloting "Shift and Save" TOU rates to further encourage the shifting of loads to midday solar hours.
6.4 Florida: The "Veto" Exception
Florida remains a notable outlier. In 2022, the state legislature passed HB 741, which would have phased down net metering in a manner very similar to California. However, Governor Ron DeSantis vetoed the bill, citing inflation concerns and the desire to keep costs low for consumers.28
- Current Status: Florida remains one of the few high-solar states with full retail net metering (1-to-1) intact for 2025.
- Future Risk: Despite the veto, the legislative intent to dismantle net metering remains strong among utilities (FPL, Duke). Homeowners in Florida currently enjoy a "golden era" of solar economics but should be aware that legislative winds could shift again.
6.5 Texas: The Deregulated Wild West
Texas lacks a statewide net metering mandate. In its deregulated energy market, compensation depends entirely on the Retail Electric Provider (REP) chosen by the homeowner.30
- Plan Variety: Plans range from "Real-Time Wholesale" buybacks (indexed to the chaotic ERCOT market prices) to "capped credit" plans where exports are credited at the energy charge rate but cannot offset TDU (delivery) charges.
- Market Trend: Many REPs (like Octopus Energy and Chariot) are innovating with "Real-Time" buyback plans that function similarly to NEM 3.0: exports are worth very little most of the time but can spike to $5.00/kWh during grid emergencies. This makes batteries essential for Texas homeowners not just for outage protection (a major concern in Texas) but for economic arbitrage in the ERCOT market.
6.6 Nevada: Tiered Net Metering
Nevada employs a tiered system for net metering that adjusts as capacity benchmarks are met.
- Tiered Tranches: As more solar is installed, the credit rate for excess energy decreases. Current tiers (e.g., NMR-405 Tranche 4) credit excess energy at 75% of the retail rate.31
- Netting Interval: Nevada is also transitioning toward finer netting intervals (15-minute), moving away from monthly netting for certain rate classes.31
---
Chapter 7: Real Estate, Transferability, and Legacy Rights
For homeowners, solar is a long-term asset attached to real property. Understanding how the regulatory status of that asset transfers during a home sale is critical for valuation.
7.1 The 20-Year Legacy Asset (NEM 1.0/2.0)
Homes with systems interconnected before April 15, 2023, possess a significant financial advantage.
- Transferability: The 20-year grandfathering period travels with the utility meter. If a homeowner sells a NEM 2.0 home in Year 5, the buyer effectively purchases a home with "subsidized energy rates" for the next 15 years.10
- Valuation: Real estate professionals are increasingly recognizing NEM 2.0 homes as premium assets. A buyer of a NEM 2.0 home avoids the need to purchase a battery to make solar viable, saving $10,000–$15,000 in upfront capital compared to a new NEM 3.0 installation.
- Expansion Traps: Homeowners must be cautious. Expanding a NEM 2.0 system by more than 1 kW or 10% of its original capacity (whichever is greater) triggers a system-wide reset to NEM 3.0.9 To add capacity for a new EV, it is often better to install a separate, non-exporting system or add a battery (which does not trigger a reset) rather than expanding the main NEM 2.0 array.
7.2 The 9-Year Non-Transferable Asset (NEM 3.0)
NEM 3.0 significantly degrades the resale value proposition.
- Loss of Lock-In: The 9-year lock-in of the ACC schedule is lost upon sale.9
- Non-Transferable: Critically, this 9-year lock-in is not transferable to a new homebuyer. Upon the sale of the property, the new owner loses the seller's vintage status and is reset to the current ACC rules and adders applicable at the time of transfer. This creates a "reset" risk that did not exist under NEM 1.0 or 2.0.
---
Chapter 8: The Federal Overlay — Tax Credits and Future Incentives
While state policies like NEM 3.0 define the operational economics, federal incentives determine the upfront capital viability.
8.1 The Investment Tax Credit (ITC)
The 30% Federal Investment Tax Credit (ITC) is the bedrock of the US solar market.
- Current Status (2025): Under the Inflation Reduction Act, the ITC is set at 30% for systems installed through 2032.18 This credit applies to both solar PV and standalone battery storage (capacity > 3 kWh).
- Importance to NEM 3.0: Because NEM 3.0 forces homeowners to purchase expensive batteries (adding ~$12k-$15k to the project cost), the 30% ITC is essential to keeping the payback period under 10 years. Without it, the ROI for NEM 3.0 systems would likely exceed the warranty period of the equipment.
8.2 The "2026 Cliff" and Legislative Risk
While the IRA extended the credit to 2032, political volatility introduces risk.
- 2025 Legislative Threat: Current congressional discussions and proposals in 2025 have floated the idea of repealing or modifying the residential clean energy credit (Section 25D) after December 31, 2025.18
- Safe Harbor: Unlike commercial solar, residential solar credits generally do not have "safe harbor" provisions (where paying 5% upfront locks in the credit). Residential systems must usually be "placed in service" (installed and operational) by the deadline. Homeowners considering solar in 2025 should closely monitor these legislative developments, as a repeal would be catastrophic for NEM 3.0 economics.
---
Chapter 9: The Legal & Regulatory Battleground
The implementation of NEM 3.0 was not accepted quietly. It remains the subject of intense legal scrutiny.
9.1 The California Supreme Court Challenge
In a significant development in 2025, the California Supreme Court issued a ruling requiring the lower Court of Appeal to reconsider challenges to NEM 3.0 brought by environmental groups.34
- The Argument: The plaintiffs argue that the CPUC violated state law (AB 327) by failing to account for the full societal benefits of rooftop solar (reduced transmission costs, environmental resilience) and by creating a tariff that disproportionately harms low-income communities.
- Implications: While this ruling keeps the hope of a reversal alive, NEM 3.0 remains in effect. The legal process is slow. Homeowners should not delay installations in hopes of a return to NEM 2.0. Even if the court rules against the CPUC, any remedy would likely be prospective rather than retroactive.
9.2 The "Fixed Charge" Controversy (AB 205)
Separate from NEM 3.0, California utilities are pursuing an "Income-Graduated Fixed Charge" (IGFC) authorized by AB 205. While the initial proposals for high fixed charges ($30-$70/month) were scaled back, the trend toward higher fixed fees—which cannot be offset by solar—continues to threaten the savings potential of solar customers.
---
Chapter 10: Conclusion and Strategic Roadmap for Homeowners
The transition from NEM 1.0 to NEM 3.0 marks the end of the "early adopter" phase of the US solar market and the beginning of the "grid integration" phase. The era of the grid acting as a free, unlimited battery is over. In its place is a market that demands active participation, energy intelligence, and storage infrastructure. By synthesizing data on payback periods, grandfathering provisions, transferability rules, and emerging technologies, this report serves as a definitive roadmap for homeowners, industry stakeholders, and policymakers navigating the complex modern landscape of distributed energy.
- Batteries are Mandatory: In NEM 3.0 and similar Net Billing jurisdictions (AZ, NC, TX), a battery is no longer an optional upgrade for power outages; it is a financial requirement.
- Size for Self-Consumption: The goal is no longer to cover 100% of usage by exporting massive amounts in summer. The goal is to cover 80-90% of usage by ensuring the home rarely touches the grid during peak pricing hours.
- Act on "Glideslopes": In states with declining export rates (AZ) or declining adders (CA), delaying an installation permanently reduces the lifetime value of the system.
- Maximize Legacy Assets: For those lucky enough to have NEM 1.0 or 2.0 systems, these are valuable assets. They should be maintained, and any expansion plans should be carefully weighed against the risk of losing grandfathered status.
Ultimately, while the payback periods have lengthened, solar plus storage remains a viable hedge against rising utility rates. The modern solar home is not just a power plant; it is a smart energy node, capable of storing cheap power, avoiding expensive power, and participating in the increasingly volatile energy markets of the future.
Summary of Key Policy Differences
| Feature | NEM 1.0 | NEM 2.0 | NEM 3.0 (Net Billing) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Export Valuation | Retail Rate (1-to-1) | Retail Rate (minus NBCs) | Avoided Cost (Wholesale) |
| Netting Period | Annual / Monthly | Annual / Monthly | Instantaneous (15-min) |
| TOU Rates | Generally Optional | Mandatory | Mandatory (Electrification) |
| Fixed Charges | Minimal | Non-Bypassable Charges (NBCs) | NBCs + High Fixed Monthly Fees |
| Grandfathering | 20 Years | 20 Years | 9 Years (Legacy Period) |
| Transferability | Fully Transferable | Fully Transferable | Lost on Sale (Reset) |
| Battery Role | Optional (Backup) | Optional (Optimization) | Essential (Arbitrage) |
| Payback Period | 3-5 Years | 4-6 Years | 7-9 Years (with Battery) |
Table Data Sources: 1
Works cited
- Key Differences Between NEM 2.0 vs. NEM 3.0 – Exro Technologies, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.exro.com/industry-insights/california-net-energy-metering-policies
- What Is NEM 3.0? Complete Guide To California's New Solar Policy (2025) – SolarTech, accessed December 4, 2025, https://solartechonline.com/blog/what-is-nem-3-0-california-solar-guide/
- Net Metering vs. Self-Reliance: Which Saves You More Money? | EcoFlow US, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.ecoflow.com/us/blog/net-metering-vs-self-reliance
- Clean Energy Alliance Explains NEM 2.0 vs NEM 3.0, accessed December 4, 2025, https://thecleanenergyalliance.org/clean-energy-alliance-explains-nem-2-0-vs-nem-3-0/
- Clarification on NEM 3.0 vs NEM 2.0 : r/solar – Reddit, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/solar/comments/11mf1tb/clarification_on_nem_30_vs_nem_20/
- NEM 3.0 in California: What You Need to Know – EnergySage, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.energysage.com/blog/net-metering-3-0/
- Guide to Net Metering in California & NEM 3.0 Impact – Solar Insure, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.solarinsure.com/guide-to-net-metering-in-california-nem-3-0-impact
- NEM 3.0: What Changes Are Coming? – NRG Clean Power, accessed December 4, 2025, https://nrgcleanpower.com/learning-center/nem-what-changes-are-coming/
- Frequently asked questions about changes to California's rooftop solar rules (aka "NEM3"), accessed December 4, 2025, https://solarrights.org/blog/2024/10/01/faqnem3/
- California Net Metering – transfer with home sale? : r/solar – Reddit, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/solar/comments/11boxit/california_net_metering_transfer_with_home_sale/
- Net Billing Tariff (NEM 3.0) | Tesla Support, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.tesla.com/support/energy/solar-panels/learn/net-billing
- 2024 Updates to Net Billing (NEM 3) – Revel Energy, accessed December 4, 2025, https://revel-energy.com/2024-net-billing-updates-nem-3/
- NEM 3 Suggested Settings : r/TeslaSolar – Reddit, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/TeslaSolar/comments/1f4kg30/nem_3_suggested_settings/
- NEM 2.0 vs. NEM 3.0: What Are The Differences? – Solar Optimum, accessed December 4, 2025, https://solaroptimum.com/nem-2-0-vs-nem-3-0-what-are-the-differences/
- Net Billing vs Net Metering: Understanding the Best Choice for Solar Energy – Parker & Sons, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.parkerandsons.com/blog/net-billing-vs-net-metering-understanding-the-best-choice-for-solar-energy
- NEM 3.0 In California: What Homeowners Need To Know About Net Billing – SolarReviews, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/california-nem-3-net-billing
- Explaining and modeling California's Net Billing Tariff (NEM 3.0) | Aurora Solar, accessed December 4, 2025, https://aurorasolar.com/blog/explaining-and-modeling-californias-net-billing-tariff-nem-3-0/
- California Solar Incentives 2025: Complete Guide To Tax Credits & Rebates – SolarTech, accessed December 4, 2025, https://solartechonline.com/blog/california-solar-incentives-2025-guide/
- Batteries & NEM 3.0 Guidance | Amy's Roofing & Solar, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.amyrs.com/batteries-on-nem3/
- Unlock the full potential of NEM 3.0 with Enphase, accessed December 4, 2025, https://enphase.com/download/nem-30-quick-guide-installers
- APS Is Slashing Solar Buyback Rates on September First, accessed December 4, 2025, https://southfacesolar.com/solar-blog/aps-is-slashing-solar-buyback-rates-on-september-1st/
- RATE RIDER RCP PARTIAL REQUIREMENTS SERVICE FOR NEW ON-SITE SOLAR DISTRIBUTED GENERATION RESOURCE COMPARISON PROXY EXPORT RATE – APS, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.aps.com/-/media/APS/APSCOM-PDFs/Utility/Regulatory-and-Legal/Regulatory-Plan-Details-Tariffs/Residential/Renewable-Plans-and-Riders/rcp_RateSchedule.ashx
- How Net Metering Changed The Solar Industry In North Carolina, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.sugarhollowsolar.com/blog/how-net-metering-changes-shape-the-solar-landscape-in-north-carolina
- Everything North Carolina Residents Can Expect From Duke Energy's New Solar Net Metering Policy – SolarReviews, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.solarreviews.com/news/duke-energy-new-net-metering-policy
- Understanding Solar Net Metering Changes Impacting Duke Energy Customers, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.energync.org/blog/understanding-solar-net-metering-changes-impacting-duke-energy-customers/
- PUC Order Allows More Customers to Join Grid Supply Program – Alternate Energy Hawaii, accessed December 4, 2025, https://alternateenergyhawaii.com/blog/puc-order-allows-more-customers-join-grid-supply-program
- SRE Smart DER Export Program Flyer – Hawaiian Electric, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.hawaiianelectric.com/documents/products_and_services/customer_renewable_programs/sre_smart_der_export_program_flyer.pdf
- Let the Sunshine In: Is There a Future for Residential Rooftop Solar Energy in Florida?, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.floridabar.org/the-florida-bar-journal/let-the-sunshine-in-is-there-a-future-for-residential-rooftop-solar-energy-in-florida/
- POLICY UPDATE: Florida Legislators pass an Anti-Solar Net Metering bill that would make Rooftop Sol – Energy Toolbase, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.energytoolbase.com/blog/policyupdate/florida-passes-an-anti-solar-net-metering-bill/
- Texas Solar Buyback Plans & Net Metering Programs (2025) – Quick Electricity, accessed December 4, 2025, https://quickelectricity.com/texas-solar-buyback-net-metering-programs/
- Net Metering – NV Energy, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.nvenergy.com/account-services/energy-pricing-plans/net-metering
- NEM 3.0: Learn About California's New Solar Net Billing Program – Palmetto, accessed December 4, 2025, https://palmetto.com/policy/nem-3-0-california
- 2026-2027 U.S. Solar and HVAC Incentives After Federal Credits End | AC Direct, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.acdirect.com/blog/2026-2027-us-solar-hvac-incentives-post-federal-credit-era/
- California Supreme Court orders re-review of CPUC's anti-rooftop solar changes, accessed December 4, 2025, https://cashnet.org/news/710094/California-Supreme-Court-orders-re-review-of-CPUCs-anti-rooftop-solar-changes.htm
- A Landmark Ruling For California Solar Homeowners Could Save Them $20,000 | EnergySage, accessed December 4, 2025, https://www.energysage.com/news/california-supreme-court-orders-nem-3-reconsideration/
