Converting oil to electric heat cost

The residential heating landscape in the United States is currently navigating its most significant structural transformation since the shift from coal to oil in the mid-20th century. For decades, the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic regions have relied heavily on fuel oil—a legacy of post-war infrastructure and cheap petroleum. However, as of 2025, a convergence of federal policy, volatile global energy markets, and the maturation of cold-climate inverter technology has created an inflection point. Homeowners are no longer merely replacing broken boilers; they are engaging in a complex capital expenditure decision that involves decoupling their homes from the global petroleum supply chain in favor of the electric grid.
This transition is driven by the stark economic and environmental realities of the current decade. Heating oil, a commodity subject to the whims of geopolitical stability and refining capacity, has maintained a structural cost disadvantage compared to other heating sources.1 Simultaneously, the federal government, through the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), and various state agencies have mobilized billions of dollars in rebates and tax incentives designed to accelerate the adoption of electric heat pumps.2 Yet, the narrative of "electrifying everything" often glosses over the granular, often gritty, realities of the retrofit process.
This report serves as an exhaustive technical and economic analysis of switching from oil to electric heating. It moves beyond the surface-level marketing of "clean energy" to investigate the specific logistical hurdles of decommissioning legacy infrastructure, the nuanced performance of heat pumps in sub-zero environments, and the complex financial calculus that homeowners must navigate. By synthesizing data from regulatory filings, technical manuals, user reports, and market analysis, we provide a clear-eyed view of what it truly takes to leave oil behind in 2025.

2. The Economic Landscape: Volatility vs. Regulation

The foundational argument for switching from oil to electricity is economic, yet the comparison is rarely apples-to-apples. It requires an understanding of fuel dynamics, equipment efficiency, and the "thermal balance point" where economics shift.

2.1 The Structural Disadvantage of Heating Oil

Heating oil prices are inextricably linked to the global crude oil market and the "crack spread"—the differential between the price of crude and the petroleum products refined from it.4 In late 2024 and throughout 2025, while high regional inventories on the East Coast temporarily stabilized some pricing, the long-term trend reflects volatility that the regulated electricity market largely avoids. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) Winter Fuels Outlook for 2025-2026 projects that while heating oil expenditures may fluctuate based on winter severity, oil remains one of the most expensive methods to heat a home, often exceeding the cost of propane and significantly outpacing high-efficiency heat pumps.1
Data suggests a distinct hierarchy in operating costs for 2025. While natural gas remains competitively priced in many regions, oil occupies the highest tier of expense. Users in states like Pennsylvania and Massachusetts have reported that despite rising electricity rates, the total energy expenditure drops significantly when eliminating oil deliveries. One detailed case study of a Pennsylvania home revealed that total annual energy costs dropped from a range of $2,500–$4,000 (combined oil and electric) to approximately $1,700–$1,900 after full electrification.6
Table 1: Comparative Annual Heating Costs by Fuel Type (2025 Projections)

Fuel Type	Estimated Annual Cost	Cost Efficiency vs. Oil	Dependency Factors
Fuel Oil	$2,275 - $3,000+	Baseline	Global crude markets, refining capacity, delivery logistics
Propane	$3,418	+50% (More Expensive)	Natural gas byproducts, export demand
Electric Heat Pump	$1,700 - $1,900	-25% to -40% (Savings)	Grid rates (kWh), System COP, Winter severity
Geothermal Heat Pump	$1,500	-45% (Savings)	Grid rates (kWh), Installation depth

Source: Derived from Energy Kinetics data 1 and CNET longitudinal case studies.6

2.2 The Coefficient of Performance (COP) Equation

The economic viability of a heat pump is mathematically defined by its Coefficient of Performance (COP). Unlike an oil boiler, which can never be more than 100% efficient (and is typically 80-85% efficient for older units), a heat pump moves heat rather than generating it. Modern cold-climate systems can achieve a COP of 3.0 to 4.0 in mild weather (producing 3 to 4 units of heat for every 1 unit of electricity).4
However, this efficiency is not static. As outdoor temperatures drop, the COP decreases. The critical metric for homeowners is the "break-even COP"—the efficiency level at which the cost of running the heat pump equals the cost of burning oil. In regions with high electricity rates (e.g., Connecticut or Massachusetts at $0.30+/kWh), the heat pump must maintain a relatively high COP to be cheaper than oil. If the system is undersized or poorly designed and relies on electric resistance backup (COP of 1.0) during deep freezes, the operating cost can momentarily exceed that of oil.7 This nuanced reality explains why some users report "bill shock" in January if their system was not optimized for their specific thermal envelope.

3. Decommissioning Legacy Infrastructure: The Hidden Costs

The transition to electric heat is often marketed as a simple appliance swap. In reality, it involves the demolition of a hazardous materials infrastructure. The removal of the "oil ecosystem"—the tank, the boiler, and the asbestos often adhering to them—is a significant phase of the project that carries legal and environmental weight.

3.1 The Oil Tank: Liability and Logistics

The heating oil tank is the single greatest liability in a residential fossil fuel system. Whether buried in the yard or sitting in the basement, these steel vessels have a finite lifespan, typically 20 to 25 years. By 2025, many tanks installed during the suburban expansions of the late 20th century are reaching critical failure points.

3.1.1 Underground Storage Tanks (USTs)

Underground tanks represent the most complex removal scenario. Because they are buried, leaks can go undetected for years, saturating the surrounding soil with hydrocarbons.

Removal Costs: The average cost to remove a UST ranges from $1,500 to $3,000 for the excavation and disposal of the tank itself.9 This process involves heavy machinery to excavate the yard, cutting open the tank, cleaning the sludge (residual heavy oil), and disposing of the steel at a licensed facility.
The Remediation Nightmare: If a leak is discovered during removal—evidenced by soil discoloration or petroleum odors—the project shifts from a simple removal to an environmental remediation. Soil testing and cleanup can escalate costs to $5,000–$20,000 or more depending on the plume's extent.11
State-Level Variances:
- Pennsylvania: The "Underground Heating Oil Tank Cleanup Reimbursement Program" aids eligible homeowners with cleanup costs for tanks 3,000 gallons or less, provided the leak occurred after 1998 and specific criteria are met.12
- Oregon: State regulations demand a rigorous risk assessment for decommissioning, which can cost around $5,000 even if no soil is removed, emphasizing the high regulatory burden in the Pacific Northwest.11
- Massachusetts: State law mandates that insurance companies offer coverage for leaks if the system is brought up to code, but standard policies often exclude it, leaving many homeowners exposed to "voluntary" cleanup costs if they choose to remove a non-leaking tank.13

3.1.2 Above-Ground Tanks (ASTs)

Basement or garage tanks are less expensive to remove but still pose logistical challenges.

Cost: Removal typically costs between $400 and $1,000.10 This involves draining the remaining fuel, cutting the tank into maneuverable sections (often using reciprocating saws or nibblers to avoid sparks), and carrying the steel out of the home.
Space Reclamation: A significant non-monetary benefit of AST removal is the reclamation of basement square footage, often 10-20 square feet, which can be repurposed for storage or living space.15

3.2 The Asbestos Complication

Homes built prior to 1980 often utilized asbestos-containing materials (ACM) to insulate boiler pipes and jackets. The vibration and disruption of removing an old boiler can release carcinogenic fibers, making professional abatement a non-negotiable legal requirement in many jurisdictions.

Financial Impact: In 2025, professional asbestos abatement averages $2,235, with a typical range of $1,170 to $3,264.16
Specifics: Pipe insulation is often billed at $5 to $20 per square foot. If the boiler jacket itself contains asbestos, it must be encapsulated or removed under negative air pressure containment, further adding to labor hours.18 Homeowners attempting to bypass this step risk severe legal penalties and long-term health hazards.

3.3 The Scrap Value Myth

A persistent misconception among homeowners is that the cast iron from their massive old boiler holds significant monetary value that will offset removal costs. Investigative analysis of the scrap metal market in 2025 confirms this is largely a myth.

Market Reality: While cast iron is recyclable, its market value is low—roughly $0.08 per pound for prepared iron.19 A 500-pound boiler might theoretically be worth $40 at a scrap yard.
Labor Economics: The labor required to disconnect, drain, break down, and haul a 500-pound unit up a flight of basement stairs far exceeds the scrap value. HVAC contractors typically charge $1,000 to $2,000 for the demolition service alone.20 The scrap value is generally viewed by the industry as a minor perk for the hauling crew, roughly covering their fuel, rather than a discount mechanism for the homeowner.21

4. Infrastructure Retrofits: The Electrical Backbone

Switching from oil to heat pumps is an energy conversion project: replacing chemical energy (oil) with electrical energy. This places a new, substantial load on the home's electrical panel.

4.1 The 100-Amp Limit

Many older homes in the Northeast utilizing oil heat were built with 100-amp (or even 60-amp) electrical services. A modern home with electric cooking, laundry, and general appliances can consume a significant portion of this capacity. Adding a whole-home heat pump system, which may draw 30 to 50 amps during peak operation (plus auxiliary heat strips), often necessitates a "heavy-up" to 200-amp service.

4.2 Cost of Electrical Upgrades

The financial outlay for electrical upgrades is a critical line item in the conversion budget.

200-Amp Upgrade: In 2025, upgrading from 100A to 200A typically costs between $1,800 and $4,500.22 This wide range accounts for variables such as the distance to the transformer, the need for a new meter socket, and regional labor rates (typically $55–$85 per hour).22
400-Amp Service: For forward-looking homeowners anticipating Electric Vehicle (EV) chargers, induction stoves, and heat pumps simultaneously, a 400-amp service may be required. This is a significantly more complex project, often involving dual 200-amp panels, and costs between $8,000 and $12,000.22
Inflation Reduction Act Support: It is crucial to note that the IRA offers a specific tax credit of up to $600 for electrical panel upgrades if they are installed in conjunction with a qualified heat pump, helping to defray a portion of this cost.24

5. Heat Pump Technologies: Architecture and Application

The "electrification of heat" is not a monolithic solution. The architecture of the new system depends entirely on the home's existing distribution method: forced air (ducts) vs. hydronic (radiators/baseboards).

5.1 The Ducted Scenario: Central Air-Source Heat Pumps (ASHP)

For homes that already have ductwork (e.g., those with an oil furnace or existing central AC), the transition is relatively straightforward physically, though technical sizing is paramount.

Cold Climate Performance: Modern inverter-driven units, such as those from Mitsubishi (Hyper-Heat), Daikin (Fit), and Carrier, are designed to maintain 100% heating capacity down to 5°F or lower, with operation continuing efficiently down to -13°F.25
Static Pressure: A common failure mode in retrofits is neglecting duct sizing. Heat pumps typically require higher airflow (CFM) per BTU than oil furnaces. Pushing high airflow through undersized ducts designed for high-temperature oil heat can result in noise and reduced efficiency.

5.2 The Hydronic Challenge: Radiators and Baseboards

A significant portion of the Northeast housing stock relies on hydronic heating (cast iron radiators or copper fin-tube baseboards). Converting these homes presents the most significant technical challenge.

5.2.1 Ductless Mini-Splits

The most common solution for radiator homes is to abandon the hydronic system entirely in favor of ductless mini-splits.

Pros: This bypasses the need to install intrusive ductwork. It offers granular zoning (heating only the rooms in use) and extremely high efficiency (SEER2 ratings of 20+).27
Cons: Aesthetics are a frequent barrier; wall-mounted "heads" are visually intrusive to some. Furthermore, line sets (refrigerant pipes) must be run along the exterior of the home.
Managing Abandoned Radiators: Once switched, the old radiators must be dealt with. If removal is too costly or destructive, homeowners often choose to drain and cap the pipes. This can be done at floor level using brass caps or, for a cleaner look, below the floorboards if the ceiling below is accessible.28 Leaving water in abandoned radiators in an unheated house risks catastrophic freezing/bursting pipes.

5.2.2 Air-to-Water (A2W) Heat Pumps

An emerging technology in the US market for 2025 is the Air-to-Water heat pump. These units look like standard AC condensers but produce hot water instead of hot air, theoretically allowing them to connect to existing radiators.

The Temperature Mismatch: Standard oil boilers are designed to supply water at 160°F–180°F. Most residential heat pumps struggle to efficiently produce water above 120°F–130°F. Using 120°F water in radiators designed for 180°F results in insufficient heat output.27
Retrofit Requirements: To make A2W work, homeowners often must replace existing radiators with "low-temperature" radiators (larger surface area) or fan-coil units that assist heat transfer.
Market Availability: While standard in Europe, A2W units remain a niche product in the US. Brands like SpacePak, Nordic, and Arctic are available, and major players like Daikin and Mitsubishi are introducing products, but contractor familiarity remains low compared to air-to-air systems.31

5.3 Hybrid (Dual-Fuel) Systems: The Pragmatic Middle Ground

For many, a full switch is deemed too risky or capital-intensive. The hybrid approach retains the oil boiler for extreme cold while using a heat pump for the majority of the winter.

Operational Logic: The heat pump handles the load when outdoor temperatures are moderate (e.g., 35°F to 60°F), capitalizing on its high COP (300–400% efficiency). When temperatures plunge below a set "switchover point" (e.g., 30°F), the system automatically reverts to the oil boiler.33
Integrated Controls: The success of a hybrid system relies on "Integrated Controls"—smart thermostats that monitor outdoor temperature and, in some advanced iterations, real-time fuel prices to determine the most economic heat source. Mass Save explicitly incentivizes these controls, offering up to $1,500 for their installation.35
Pros & Cons: This approach reduces oil consumption by 80-90% without requiring the removal of the tank or the oversizing of the heat pump for peak load. However, it maintains the liability of the oil tank and the maintenance costs of two separate mechanical systems.36

6. The Regulatory and Incentive Landscape: 2025 Status

The financial viability of removing oil heat is heavily subsidized by a complex web of federal and state programs. Understanding these incentives is critical for calculating the true ROI.

6.1 Federal Incentives: The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA)

The IRA continues to be the bedrock of electrification subsidies in 2025.

25C Tax Credit: The Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit allows homeowners to deduct 30% of the project cost, capped at $2,000 per year for heat pumps. Importantly, this credit resets annually, allowing strategic phasing of projects (e.g., heat pump water heater in year 1, HVAC in year 2).2
Panel Upgrade Credit: An additional credit of up to $600 is available for panel upgrades necessary to support the heat pump.24
Domestic Content: Looking toward late 2025, additional bonus credits may apply for equipment meeting strict domestic manufacturing requirements, though enforcement and certification of these supply chains remains a developing area.2

6.2 State Rebate Programs (HOMES and HEAR)

The Department of Energy (DOE) has allocated billions to states to administer point-of-sale rebates, specifically the Home Efficiency Rebates (HOMES) and Home Electrification and Appliance Rebates (HEAR).

6.2.1 New York (NYSERDA & Clean Heat)

New York remains a leader in incentive magnitude.

EmPower+ and HEAR: Income-eligible New Yorkers can receive massive subsidies. For low-to-moderate income (LMI) households, rebates can cover up to 100% of costs in some specific programs, with caps like $8,000 for whole-home heat pumps and $4,000 for electric panel upgrades.3
Wiring and Insulation: Specific line-item rebates exist for electrical wiring ($2,500) and insulation/air sealing ($1,600), recognizing that a heat pump is only as good as the envelope it heats.39

6.2.2 Massachusetts (Mass Save)

Mass Save offers some of the most lucrative, yet strict, incentives in the nation.

Whole-Home Rebates: Homeowners can receive rebates often reaching $10,000 for displacing fossil fuels. However, receiving the full amount typically requires the complete decommissioning of the oil system or the verification that the heat pump is sized to handle 100% of the load.40
Partial Displacement: For those keeping the oil boiler (Hybrid), rebates are lower but still significant, contingent on the installation of the previously mentioned Integrated Controls.41
2025 Deadlines: Note that some specific tax interactions and state program funding rounds have deadlines tied to the end of 2025, creating urgency for current applicants.40

6.2.3 California (TECH Clean California)

While less focused on "oil" removal than the Northeast, California's programs target gas and propane displacement but apply to oil as well.

HEEHRA Launch: The single-family HEEHRA rebates (part of the federal HEAR allocation) have launched as of late 2025. Income-qualified households can reserve rebates for heat pump water heaters (up to $2,500) and HVAC systems.42
Funding Availability: Unlike tax credits, these are budget-limited. The TECH Clean California budget is reported regularly, and funds are allocated on a first-come, first-served reservation basis.43

6.2.4 Texas and Florida

In the South, the focus shifts toward efficiency (SEER2) rather than fuel switching.

Texas: The State Energy Conservation Office is managing the rollout of HOMES and HEAR with $690 million in funding, targeting mid-2025 for broader availability. This will focus on LMI homeowners improving envelope efficiency alongside equipment.44
Florida: Utilities like Florida Power & Light (FPL) and Duke Energy offer rebates, but they are modest compared to the Northeast (e.g., hundreds rather than thousands of dollars) and focus on upgrading from low-efficiency AC to high-efficiency Heat Pumps rather than oil displacement.45

Table 2: Key 2025 Incentive Structures by Region

Region/State	Program Name	Primary Incentive Structure	Max Potential Value (LMI)	Focus
Federal	IRA (25C)	Tax Credit (Non-refundable)	$2,000/yr (Heat Pump) + $600 (Panel)	National Baseline
New York	NY Clean Heat / EmPower+	Point-of-Sale Rebate	$8,000 (HP) + $6,500 (Wiring/Panel)	Whole-home electrification
Massachusetts	Mass Save	Rebate / 0% Financing	~$10,000	Oil displacement / Integrated Controls
California	TECH Clean CA	Point-of-Sale Rebate	~$2,500 - $8,000 (Income dependent)	Decarbonization / Water Heating
Texas	SECO (HOMES/HEAR)	Rebate (Launch Mid-2025)	TBD (Federal Guidelines: up to $14k max cap)	Efficiency Retrofits

Source: Aggregated from NYSERDA 38, Mass Save 40, and TECH Clean CA 42 documentation.

7. User Experience and Operational Realities

Switching fuel sources is not just a financial transaction; it necessitates a behavioral shift. The user experience of a heat pump differs fundamentally from an oil boiler.

7.1 The "Cold Blow" Physics

One of the most common complaints from new adopters is that the air coming from the vents feels "cold," even when the room is warming up.

The Mechanism: An oil furnace burns fuel at ~2000°F and delivers air at 130°F–140°F. This feels hot to the hand. A heat pump, by contrast, delivers air at 95°F–105°F to maximize efficiency.
Perception: Since average human skin temperature is roughly 98.6°F, air moving at 95°F creates a wind-chill effect that registers as "cool" to touch, despite being warm enough to heat the room to 70°F. Homeowners must be educated that this is a feature of efficient operation, not a bug.47

7.2 Defrost Cycles and Noise

Oil boilers are generally noisy in the basement but silent outside. Heat pumps are the opposite.

Outdoor Noise: The outdoor compressor and fan generate noise, typically 50-60 decibels. While quiet, placement near a bedroom window or a neighbor's patio can cause friction.
Defrost Mode: In winter, the outdoor coil condenses moisture which freezes. The system must periodically reverse cycle to melt this ice. During this "defrost cycle," the outdoor unit may emit steam and strange groaning noises, and the indoor fan may temporarily blow cool air (unless auxiliary heat strips engage to temper it). Uninformed users often mistake this for a malfunction or fire (steam).47

7.3 Thermostat Management: "Set it and Forget it"

Decades of energy advice taught homeowners to use "setbacks"—turning the heat down to 60°F at night to save oil. This practice is detrimental to heat pump efficiency.

Recovery Efficiency: Heat pumps are most efficient when maintaining a steady temperature. Asking a heat pump to recover from 60°F to 70°F in one hour on a cold morning forces the system into "turbo" mode (high compressor speed) or engages the electric resistance backup strips.
The Cost Penalty: Resistance strips have a COP of 1.0. Relying on them for morning recovery can negate the efficiency gains of the heat pump, leading to the "bill shock" described in section 2.8 The consensus best practice for 2025 is "Set it and Forget it."

8. Environmental and Insurance Implications

8.1 Carbon Abatement

The environmental argument for heat pumps is robust, particularly in the Northeast where the grid intensity is lower than the national average.

Emissions Math: Analyses indicate that switching from an oil furnace to a heat pump in the Northeast can reduce a home's direct carbon emissions by approximately 40%, even when accounting for fugitive refrigerant emissions (leakage).50
Grid Impact: However, this transition shifts the burden to the grid. ISO New England and other grid operators have noted that widespread electrification will shift the region from a "summer peaking" (AC driven) grid to a "winter peaking" (heating driven) grid, requiring significant infrastructure investments to ensure reliability.51

8.2 Insurance Premiums and Resale Value

Beyond the environment, getting rid of oil has tangible insurance benefits.

Premium Reduction: While not all insurers explicitly offer a "heat pump discount," the removal of the oil tank eliminates a major surcharge category. Some carriers refuse to write policies for homes with underground tanks due to the remediation liability. Removing the tank and providing a "clean" soil report can make the home insurable by a wider range of carriers, indirectly lowering premiums.52
Disclosure Laws: In states like New York, property condition disclosure statements now strictly require information on the status of any fuel tanks. A certified removal is a marketable asset during resale, whereas an "abandoned" tank is a red flag that can derail closings.54

9. Conclusion

The transition from heating oil to electric heat pumps in 2025 is a project of significant complexity, expense, and long-term reward. It is not merely a purchase but a renovation. The homeowner moves from a model of high operational costs and low infrastructure complexity (a tank and a burner) to a model of lower operational costs but higher technical sophistication (inverters, heavy electric loads, and smart controls).
While the upfront cost of a full conversion—often reaching $15,000 to $30,000 when including panel upgrades and tank removal—is daunting, the combination of the IRA's $2,000+ annual tax credits, state rebates potentially reaching $10,000, and the elimination of the persistent liability of oil storage creates a compelling financial case. The "Hybrid" pathway remains a prudent strategy for risk-averse homeowners or those with difficult hydronic systems, offering 80% of the benefits with a safety net.
Ultimately, the switch insulates the homeowner from the volatility of the global oil market. In a world where heating oil prices are dictated by geopolitical events halfway across the globe, the electric heat pump offers a path to energy independence, anchored by the domestic grid and fueled, increasingly, by renewable electrons.

Disclaimer: This report is based on publicly available information, user reports, and technical documentation available as of late 2025. It reflects the author’s analysis and is not intended as legal, financial, or engineering advice. Rebate programs, tax codes, and insurance regulations are subject to change and vary significantly by municipality; homeowners should consult with qualified tax professionals, licensed electricians, and HVAC contractors before undertaking any work.

Works cited

Fuel Comparisons | Energy Kinetics, accessed November 30, 2025, https://energykinetics.com/savingsheatingfuelcomparisons/
Energy Efficient Home Improvement Credit | Internal Revenue Service, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.irs.gov/credits-deductions/energy-efficient-home-improvement-credit
Inflation Reduction Act - nyserda - NY.Gov, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.nyserda.ny.gov/All-Programs/Inflation-Reduction-Act
Short-Term Energy Outlook, Winter Fuels Outlook, 2024-25 - EIA, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/steo/report/perspectives/2024/10-winterfuels/article.php
US Energy Information Administration, Winter Fuels Outlook - EIA, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/steo/report/winterfuels.php
From Heating Oil to Heat Pump: One Homeowner's Energy Savings Story - CNET, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.cnet.com/home/energy-and-utilities/from-heating-oil-to-heat-pump-one-homeowners-savings-story/
At what point is it more cost efficient to run a Heat pump vs the oil burner to heat the house?, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/heatpumps/comments/1hb72sr/at_what_point_is_it_more_cost_efficient_to_run_a/
High Heating Bills even after I installed heat pumps : r/DIYHeatPumps - Reddit, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/DIYHeatPumps/comments/1jowd35/high_heating_bills_even_after_i_installed_heat/
How Much Does It Cost to Remove an Oil Tank? [2025 Data] - HomeAdvisor, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.homeadvisor.com/cost/plumbing/remove-a-water-or-fuel-storage-tank/
How Much Does Oil Tank Removal Cost? [2025 Data] - Angie's List, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.angi.com/articles/how-much-does-oil-tank-removal-cost.htm
How Much Does it Cost to Decommission an Oil Tank? - Portland Real Estate Agent, Realtor, accessed November 30, 2025, https://realestateagentpdx.com/how-much-does-it-cost-to-decommission-an-oil-tank/30745
Apply for Underground Oil Tank Cleanup Reimbursement from the Department of Environmental Protection - Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.pa.gov/services/dep/apply-for-oil-tank-cleanup-reimbursement-from-the-department-of-environmental-protection
Site Cleanup for Homeowners - Mass.gov, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.mass.gov/guides/site-cleanup-for-homeowners
Does your Massachusetts Home Insurance Cover Oil Tank Leaks?, accessed November 30, 2025, https://www.atlanticquotes.com/blog/does-your-massachusetts-home-insurance-cover-oil-tank-leaks <a id="citation-1